Richmond Council Active Travel Strategy
Thread for LBRUT consultation on thr Active Travel Strategy
79 issues found for 'richmond':
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Thread for LBRUT consultation on thr Active Travel Strategy
Local Plan for LBRUT is being revised to line up better with Mayor and local policy
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Royal Parks initial output on proposed changes to make the quietway work through Richmond Park
Created by Dexter Johnstone // 1 thread
Create protected space for cycling along Richmond Road to connect the communities of Richmond, Stradbroke and Woodthorpe and enable children to cycle to Stradbroke Primary School.
Created by Paul James // 1 thread
The shared use pavement is pinched very tight at this point where pedestrians are crossing the road and cycles are going straight on.
Visibility of pedestrians and bikes from Larkfield Rd is blocked by the building.
Continue cycleway along Richmond Circus south side.
Provide more cycle/pavement width by moving carriageway northwards or reducing to 2 lanes.
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Initial road discussions from Richmond Council
Created by jon_events // 1 thread
You can see the detailed proposals bit by bit on the link below.
I've roughly mapped out the proposed route. It essentially follows an existing part of the LCN with a few minor tweaks. Sadly no new modal filters appear to be proposed. Sinusoidal humps at the beginning of the route in Wandsworth I fear will do little to deter the speedsters.
Feel free to add your thoughts below.
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Initial quietway consultation from Richmond. This is a thread to build RCC's response
Created by Paul James // 1 thread
The exit from the car park crosses the shared use path and is blind from the drivers POV if they stop at the give way markings. This means that drivers will move blindly across the shared use path without being able to see cycles moving along the path.
The solution is to close the gate to motor traffic.
The carpark is accessible from both the driveway to Pools on the Park and from Kew Foot Road and the entrance from Pools on the Park would appear adequate to act as both an entrance and an exit.
Created by jon_events // 1 thread
Proposals that fail to deal with the elephant in the room aka non-residential through motor traffic.
Created by Simon Munk // 2 threads
Richmond council says:
The previous Mayor of London’s Vision for Cycling (2013), a 10-year plan to deliver cycling improvements across London with spending set to total £913m by 2022, announced that a cross-London network of high-quality guided cycle routes would be implemented. This was two-fold; high capacity Superhighways, mostly on main roads, for fast commuters, and slightly slower Quietways on low-traffic side streets, for those wanting a more relaxed journey, providing two clearly branded routes, together composing the ‘Central London Grid’.
Unlike the previous London Cycle Network, Quietways will be direct, better-surfaced and clearly signposted. The Quietway network will also include new off-road greenway routes through parks and along waterways, to be used for recreation and by families. Richmond’s natural assets particularly align to this purpose. Quietways aim to change the nature of cycling. Therefore, the routes will be pleasant and interesting to cycle on, showcasing hidden corners of London. Borough police resources, local community safety budgets and TfL-funded Safer Transport Command officers, lighting, CCTV coverage and patrols will ensure people feel safe using Quietways at night. Thus, it is hoped that Quietways will attract new types of cyclists and beginner cyclists. Quietways are also designed to benefit pedestrians and other road users.
The first Quietway route, from Waterloo to Greenwich, launched in June 2016 and seven Quietways are due to be completed by 2017. Richmond is proposing initially to introduce two new Quietways. TfL has agreed to fund Quietways 1 and 2 as part of ‘Phase 2’ of the Quietway programme. This consultation introduces Quietway 1, which will run between Ham and Teddington. The route comes from the neighboring borough of Wandsworth, beginning here at Richmond Park’s Ham Gate, and finishing by Bushy Park, crossing the river at Teddington Lock.
Community consultation and engagement events took place in July of this year where the proposed route was introduced. Having taken on board the feedback from the initial engagement, this new consultation seeks to present the updated proposals for Quietway 1. We welcome views from Richmond’s residents, businesses, stakeholders and visitors on the proposals.
This consultation is presented in conjunction with Richmond’s Cycling Strategy, currently also under consultation; the Quietways will help to realise Strategy Objective A. There will also be joint consultation events where there will be the opportunity to give feedback.
Created by Simon Munk // 1 thread
Richmond Council says:
"As part of the development works which have been undertaken in the area, the Council has secured funding to improve the footway and carriageway in the immediate vicinity of Star & Garter Hill / Richmond Gate. The improvements works are planned to take place in July and will include: resurfacing the footway and carriageway, upgrading the existing traffic islands / refuges, implementing a new footway that joins up to Richmond Park, and general improvements to the signage and street furniture. As part of this works, there will also be the introduction of a drop off / collection bay outside the Royal Star & Garter development."
No apparent cycling improvements.
Created by Kate // 1 thread
In order to avoid the muddy and sometimes flooded route along the riverside path it is possible to use a tarmac path across Petersham Field. However, at both ends of the field there are kissing gates which mean that larger bikes, bikes with child seats, cargo bikes, double buggies or larger prams as well as wheelchairs are either unable or struggle to get through the gate. The gates create an unappealing obstruction for "normal" bikes too.
I have been told by councillors and council officials that the gates are to keep in the cows which graze for half the year in the field. In Cambridge all the cows grazing on common land are kept in using cattle grids. Why can't this solution be used here?
Created by Kate // 1 thread
This spot is part of the route that has potential to help people cycling avoid congested unappealing George Street in order to get to Richmond station or other parts of Richmond from the riverside. When you come up Friars Lane from the riverside you reach a junction where the traffic is one way away from central Richmond.
If you follow the one way system left around the Green you add at least 5 minutes to your journey time. You cannot turn right and take the quicker route because it is one way. You also cannot turn right up King Street to join George Street because that is also one way.
You also cannot go straight across the path on the Green as this is officially a footpath.
There is more than one possible solution here: a contraflow for cyclists on the side of the Green nearest to George Street. A cycle path alongside the footpath straight across the Green.
King Street would also benefit from a contraflow which would open up the options for cyclists - particularly when the riverside route is flooded.
Created by Simon Munk // 2 threads
The Royal Park says:
"The Royal Parks is embarking on an exciting and ambitious journey to develop a Movement Strategy that will influence movement and transportation throughout our parks and London.
What is the Movement Strategy?
The Movement Strategy will set a long-term vision for how park visitors will move within, access and subsequently experience the parks.
The strategy will include a comprehensive exploration of all movement and access related issues and opportunities that are relevant to the parks both now and into the foreseeable future.
This will include (but is not limited to) increasing safety for all park users, reducing the impact of vehicle-based traffic and reducing conflict between different modes.
How will it be developed?
To develop the strategy, we will utilise an evidence-based approach to explore all current and future movement opportunities. Input from key stakeholders, including the general public, will be a critical component in exploring possibilities, conflicts and issues that will inform the creation of the strategy.
Engagement Phase One – Now Open.
We are seeking input from key partners including the general public, Transport for London, neighbouring boroughs and all interested parties. This input is a critical component in exploring possibilities, conflicts and issues that will inform the creation of the strategy.This discussion paper sets out the draft aim and principles for our Movement Strategy. These summarise our aspirations and provide the basis for developing a series of bold projects and proposals across all eight parks."
Created by Andrew Woodward // 1 thread
More cycle parking is required all over Richmond town centre if we are to reduce "fly parking" which is unsightly and inconvenient.
Created by Ross // 1 thread
Richmond Hiil and Ormond Road provide direct routes into Richmond town centre. However they are one way and force cyclists to take detours to get into town. Making these roads 2 way for cycling with contraflow cycle lanes would improve movement for cycles and remove some conflict which exists where cyclists ride on the pavement.
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Consultation by Richmond Council on Rocks Lane and some associated sections.
Council consultation is at: https://consultation.richmond.gov.uk/environment/rocks-lane
Per council consultation. Looks like a lot of money to spend for adding some parking bays.
This corner is little used by motor traffic but those that do use it often go round this corner too fast. There is no pavement and high walls on both sides of the road. Cyclists and pedestrians come from the riverside path are not expecting motor traffic so signage is needed.
There is a particular danger from delivery lorries and rubbish lorries which use this route to deliver to the pubs along this stretch of the river. I had a near miss with a Night Freight lorry.
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Small changes to this area. A new school will begin construction soon, with 400+ pupils when full.
Created by Ross // 1 thread
Cycling around Richmond town centre is tortuous on a bicycle due to the one way system. To encourage even greater cycling journeys to Richmond town centre business the one way system should be redesigned to allow 2 way cycling for bicycles on Eton Street, Paradise Road and George Street. Ideally this should be achieved with segregated cycle contraflows
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Local borough response the council's consultation on the Air Quality Action Plan
Created by MB // 1 thread
There is a useful but unmarked path from Queen's Road to Richmond Park and through to Sheen. It is used by pedestrians and cyclists & I have never seen it on any map! From Lower Grove Road, it takes you to the park via Bog Gate, or Sheen via Sheen Common.
If it were better marked on maps, better maintained & wider in places, it could form a useful section of Richmond's (paved, segregated, Dutch style?) cycling network.
Created by Andrew Woodward // 1 thread
Westbound cycle lane is painted about 2m out from the kerb for no reason; child cyclists tend to follow paint rather than the common sense option which is to cycle next to the kerb.
Created by Harry Fletcher-Wood // 1 thread
Hackney Council are consulting on further traffic reduction measures in the London Fields area. These include:
- a school street outside London Fields Primary School
- a bus gate on Lansdowne Drive (restricting access to buses and cycles only)
- a banned left turn from Mare Street onto Richmond Road.
Please let me have your thoughts by Saturday, 6th January, 2018, so I can draft a response accordingly.
Created by MB // 1 thread
It would be useful to have a 'trough' or flat section over the steps between Church Rd & the bike racks in Richmond Station to allow bikes to be wheeled up / down the steps. At the moment, even via the car park, there is no flat (with no steps) access to the bike parking racks.
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Hammersmith Bridge consultation from Richmond Council. Can be answered as a resident or business.
Created by timlennon // 1 thread
Initial proposal for consultation from Richmond Council.
Created by Andrew Woodward // 1 thread
Google streetview link: http://goo.gl/maps/Fy2cs
From TFL:
Elsinore Way junction with the A316 Lower Richmond Road
Please find attached a letter that will be sent to local residents regarding proposed changes to the junction of Elsinore Way and the A316 Lower Richmond Road.
We propose to cut back the kerb immediately to the east (upstream) of the junction, to allow a better turning circle and prevent turning vehicles coming onto the kerb and the cycle path. A shared cycle/pedestrian space will be marked around this junction. Please see the plan attached.
We are consulting the local community for their opinions regarding the proposals and we would also like to know your views. The consultation is open until 21 June 2013. Please let us know your views on the proposals by visiting our consultation website at consultations.tfl.gov.uk/streets/elsinoreway, emailing us at stengagement@tfl.gov.uk (with ‘Elsinore Way’ in the Subject line).
Created by Paul L // 1 thread
Despite having put in a cycle track from Richmond along the S side of Lower Richmond Road TFL claim that that it is impossible to link to the shared foot-way on Clifford avenue.
We have asked the council to install additional cycle parking here and at the end of Richmond Park Road. Let's see if it happens.
Created by Paul L // 0 threads
Riverside path - scenic.
Richmond bridge is NOT quiet.
The path is narrow in places and surface sometimes poor. On a Sunday it can be congested with pedestrians. How to signpost - recommended except when fine ?
Created by Paul L // 0 threads
longer than Kew Rd and any traffic can be obstructive in narrow roads.
Toucan crossings of A316, Kew Road and Mortlake Rd.
Is rat running a problem ?
Created by Andrew Woodward // 0 threads
The towpath from Richmond to Teddington lock is currently unappealing and dangerous. These photos were taken in May and the path is a lot worse after in winter or after a spring tide.
It is sufficient for people on mountain bikes who do not mind getting muddy, but not easy for children, older people, less confident cyclists, pedestrians with buggies, cyclists on cargo bikes etc to navigate - basically all the vulnerable road users who would most benefit from avoiding the busy, fast moving traffic on the narrow winding Petersham Road.
I take this route to work and I have to plan for the fact that I will get covered in mud every morning, and take it very slowly because it is so bumpy. I have seen pedestrians and those with child buggies climbing over the flood wall and walking on the grass on Petersham field in order to avoid this path. When I have my child in the bike seat I get off and walk the section between Ham House and River Lane that is pictured as I don't feel safe.
With a bit of thought this path has the potential to be an excellent car-free cycling and walking route that would tempt people out of their traffic jammed cars on Petersham Road.
See also the discussion at http://www.cyclescape.org/threads/811
Created by Jean Dollimore // 1 thread
On the 7th June 2021 Transport for London launched a trial on the use of rental electric scooters across some parts of London.
E.g. in Ealing, Hammersmith and Fulham, Richmond, Kensington and Chelsea and Tower Hamlets (ride through only) and Canary Wharf.
The City of London and Westminster plan to join the trial on the 5th July 2021.
Camden Council is now consulting on taking part in this trial.
Service operators Dott, Lime and Tier.
The e-scooters would be unlocked through the operator’s app on the user’s mobile phone and would be required to be parked within a designated parking bay at the end of a journey.
They would be permitted on public highways in Camden and cycle lanes and will share cycle contraflow facilities.
They would not be permitted on pavements or any public pedestrian space.
Riders would need to be 18 years of age or over and have a full or provisional driving licence to rent an e-scooter
Speed would be limited to 12.5mph. GPS managed speeds..
They would be parked on street in assigned dockless hire parking bays, GPS enforcement of using bays
Created by Andrew Woodward // 0 threads
Cyclist coming from the river come up Friars Lane exit and have to currently route right round Richmond Green because it is one way. Many do not and simply cycle across the green. The path across the green should be formally opened up to cyclists - as a share path with pedestrian priority - or a seperate track provided along the south side of Richmond Green.
Created by Andrew Woodward // 0 threads
More cycle parking needed in Richmond generally; and specifically at the east end of Richmond Green.
Check out bikes chained to railings on Google Streetview here:
http://goo.gl/maps/8ytDP
Created by Hounslow Cycling Campaign // 1 thread
London Borough of Hounslow is consulting on proposals to improve cycle facilities between Ivy Bridge and London Road. LBH says:
The council has received funding from Transport for London (TfL) to improve the existing cycle route from Ivy Bridge to London Road. The route forms part of the Hounslow Priority Cycle Network (route 11) as it offers a quiet, cleaner route for cycling to and from Brentford. The proposed improvements aim to create a safer more attractive route for cyclists.
If progressed, these proposals will form part of TfL’s Cycleways network, with the section in the London Borough of Hounslow forming part of a wider cycle route between Twickenham and Brentford. Improvements to the section of the route between Ivy Bridge and Twickenham will be consulted on by The London Borough of Richmond in due course.
Created by Dylan // 1 thread
There is a fairly good cycle lanes from Kingston towards Richmond up until you reach the Richmond Council border where Richmond Road (A307) turns into the Upper Ham Road (A307) and eventually Petersham Road (A307). At traffic lights along this route there are reserved areas for cyclists but along the roads there is nothing to remind drivers that cyclists share the road especially when the road narrows after Sandy Lane through Petersham. The road surface here is terrible and the speed bumps are pointless because some driver sprint between the bumps.
The best solution would be to remove the cyclists from this route altogether by upgrading the Thames Path to create a proper cycle path along the River Thames towards Richmond that currently stops at Teddington Lock. If a cycle/foot bridge linking Ham with Twickenham was built over Eel Pie along this route it would create an obvious link for those want to reach Twickenham.
74 threads found for 'richmond':
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Richmond Council Active Travel Strategy
Simon Munk
posted
A discussion on issue
RIchmond Local Plan "Direction of Travel"
timlennon
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Quietway Route - Richmond Park
timlennon
posted
CycleSheffield
A discussion on issue
Richmond Space for Cycling request
Dexter Johnstone
posted
A discussion on issue
Quietway 1: Ham - Teddington
@lastnotlost
posted
A discussion on issue
Richmond Circus pinch point
MB
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Quietway 4 - Hammersmith to A316 / Richmond Park
Paul L
posted
A discussion on issue
Quiet Routes into Central Richmond from Ham
Kate
posted
A discussion on issue
Wandsworth to Teddington Quietway consultation
Simon Parker
posted
A discussion on issue
Quietway Initial Consultation - Bushy Park to Richmond Park
RichmondTransits.blogpost.com
posted
A discussion on issue
Richmond Athletic Association carpark exit
Richmond Cycling Campaign
posted
London Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Consultation for Priory Lane
@lastnotlost
posted
A discussion on issue
Star & Garter Hill junction
timlennon
posted
A discussion on issue
The Royal Parks' draft Movement Strategy
John Chamberlain
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Richmond town centre - more cycle parking needed
Andrew Woodward
posted
A discussion on issue
Quietway 1: Ham - Teddington
Simon Munk
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Richmond Hill and Ormond Road - 2 way for cycling
Paul L
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Rocks Lane Consultation
Bridgey
posted
A discussion on issue
Nelson Road Consultation
Simon Munk
posted
A discussion on issue
Off-road Route between Ham and Richmond
Jed Baxter
posted
A discussion on issue
The Royal Parks' draft Movement Strategy
Colin Wing
posted
A discussion on issue
Blind Corner - Richmond Riverside leading to Friars Lane
Andrew Woodward
posted
A discussion on issue
Unmarked path to Richmond Park from Queen's Road
Andrew Woodward
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
East Twickenham Town Centre changes
MB
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Eton Street, George Street and Paradise Road - Make 2 way for cycling
Ross
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Air Quality Action Plan Consultation
timlennon
posted
A discussion on issue
Upper Richmond Rd West / Sheen Rd cycle lanes v2
Paul L
posted
Hackney Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
London Fields traffic reduction
Tom Power
posted
A discussion on issue
Kew Road - no cycling provision, pavement cycling
Andrew Woodward
posted
A discussion on issue
The vineyard - one way street
Andrew Woodward
posted
A discussion on issue
Queens Road - share path
MB
posted
A discussion on issue
Create quiet route to Barnes Station
MB
posted
A discussion on issue
One Way Streets - Make 2 way for Bicycles
Jon G
posted
A discussion on issue
Additional Cycle Parking In East Sheen
Ross
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Strafford Road Consultation
Simon Still
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
One Way Streets - Make 2 way for Bicycles
timlennon
posted
Richmond Cycling Campaign
A discussion on issue
Bad path surface in Cut Throat Alley, Ham
Paul L
posted
A discussion on issue
Removal of cycle track on Putney Embankment
Anon
posted
A discussion on issue
Eastbound Flambards Way Cycle Path
Anon
posted
5 library items found for 'richmond':
19 planning applications found for 'richmond':
}
|
2023/4442 Lawful Development Certificate to confirm commencement of planning permission ref: 2020/3575 dated 01/02/2021 (Erection of a... |
Wandsworth |
Lawful Development Certificate to confirm commencement of planning permission ref: 2020/3575 dated 01/02/2021 (Erection of a single-storey (plus basement) 3-bedroom detached dwellinghouse on land to the side of the existing dwelling at 332 Upper Richmond Road.) |
|
23/3252/FUL Installation of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and associated works comprising of two charging terminals on the carriageway... |
Richmond |
Installation of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and associated works comprising of two charging terminals on the carriageway adjacent to 199-207 Upper Richmond Road West. |
||
}
|
DM2024/00376 Application to vary condition 1 (approved drawings) of planning permission Ref: DM2022/00267 for the 'Demolition of the existing two... |
Sutton |
Application to vary condition 1 (approved drawings) of planning permission Ref: DM2022/00267 for the 'Demolition of the existing two storey buildings and redevelopment of the site including the erection of 5 two storey terraced houses with accommodation in the roofspace, erection of a detached tw... |
|
}
|
2024/0294 Consultation from London Borough of Richmond upon Thames: Demolition of an existing outbuilding and it's replacement with a similar... |
Elmbridge |
Consultation from London Borough of Richmond upon Thames: Demolition of an existing outbuilding and it's replacement with a similar outbuilding. [23/3245/HOT] |
|
}
|
24/T0037/TCA The bark on Tree 1 and Tree 2 would indicate that they are ash saplings. We wish to have these two trees professional removed to make... |
Richmond |
The bark on Tree 1 and Tree 2 would indicate that they are ash saplings. We wish to have these two trees professional removed to make way for planting of new trees as per planning approval 19/3568/DD03 - 09/06/2021 Tree 1 diameter, measured 1.5m from the ground is 9.5cm - see IMG_0775.jpeg Tree 2... |
|
24/0084 FORMATION OF NEW ACCESS ONTO NORTH HOUSES LANE (KNOWN VARIOUSLY AS THE 'B5410', THE 'T6 ROAD' AND THE 'M55 LINK ROAD') AND CONSTRUCTION OF... |
Fylde |
FORMATION OF NEW ACCESS ONTO NORTH HOUSES LANE (KNOWN VARIOUSLY AS THE 'B5410', THE 'T6 ROAD' AND THE 'M55 LINK ROAD') AND CONSTRUCTION OF CONNECTING ROAD BETWEEN NEW ACCESS AND INTERNAL SPINE ROAD OF THE RICHMOND POINT DEVELOPMENT (KNOWN AS ‘PARKINSON BOULEVARD’) INCLUDING ASSOCIATED HIGHWAY REC... |
||
}
|
23/T1093/TCA request to fell palm tree in back garden of 43 Richmond hill road Tree species - Trachycarpus fortunei (Chusan Palm) Fell to ground... |
Richmond |
request to fell palm tree in back garden of 43 Richmond hill road Tree species - Trachycarpus fortunei (Chusan Palm) Fell to ground level and remove all arisings. Grind stump to 12-18 inches below ground level. Ground to be left level upon completion. Palm tree named T1 in attached survey drawing... |
|
}
|
P/TRD/2023/06129 T1 - Conifer - Removal of branch back to common boundary of no. 3 Richmond Road to 25 Kings Road under regulation 14 as branch has... |
Dorset |
T1 - Conifer - Removal of branch back to common boundary of no. 3 Richmond Road to 25 Kings Road under regulation 14 as branch has partially broken and fallen into no. 3 Richmond Road. |
|
}
|
2024/0135 Consultation from London Borough of Richmond upon Thames: Conversion and extension of the site including Ruston and Karslake Buildings... |
Elmbridge |
Consultation from London Borough of Richmond upon Thames: Conversion and extension of the site including Ruston and Karslake Buildings andworks at basement level to provide 36 no. residential units (Use Class C3) and318.8sqm flexible business space (Use Class E(g)), associated car parking,access ... |
|
23/2824/FUL Planning application for the installation of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure adjacent to 334 - 336 Upper Richmond Road,... |
Richmond |
Planning application for the installation of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure adjacent to 334 - 336 Upper Richmond Road, London, SW14 7JR. |
||
}
|
2024/0276/NMA Non material amendment application in relation to 2023/0271/RES for changes:-1. Addition of a shared double garage (DG2) to serve... |
Rutland |
Non material amendment application in relation to 2023/0271/RES for changes:-1. Addition of a shared double garage (DG2) to serve plots 46-47.2. Change proposed brick and tile types as per below list of alternatives, - 'Weinerberger Maplehurst Light Multi' replace with 'Weinerberger New Red Multi... |
|
}
|
AT/2024/0064 T1 - Sweet Chestnut - Sweet chestnut ( located in school grounds) Remove x2 limbs marked on photo. To reduce density of canopy to... |
Torbay |
T1 - Sweet Chestnut - Sweet chestnut ( located in school grounds) Remove x2 limbs marked on photo. To reduce density of canopy to increase light to Richmond court flats.T2 Western Red Cedar - Crown lift Western Rd Cedar to eves of the Richmond court roof (approximately 6 metres from ground level)... |
|
}
|
ZD23/00379/FULL Full Planning Permission for a Plaque to Mark the Location of the Richmond Barracks (Former Home of the Green Howards Regiment)... |
Richmondshire |
Full Planning Permission for a Plaque to Mark the Location of the Richmond Barracks (Former Home of the Green Howards Regiment) 600mm x 300mm made from Engravers Laminate and Mounted on a Wooden Plinth |
|
}
|
23/00620/MISC28 The Electronic Communications Code (Conditions and Restrictions) (Amendment) Regulations 2017-toob intends to install fixed line... |
Rushmoor |
The Electronic Communications Code (Conditions and Restrictions) (Amendment) Regulations 2017-toob intends to install fixed line broadband electronic communications apparatus (cabinets) opposite 35 Richmond Close in Farnborough, at: FB102-UE |
|
}
|
22/1496/SDD03 Tree contribution as required by Schedule 2, Part 2, Clause 2.1 - 2.4 of the S106 agreement at Richmond Inn |
Richmond |
Tree contribution as required by Schedule 2, Part 2, Clause 2.1 - 2.4 of the S106 agreement at Richmond Inn |
|
}
|
LA10/2024/0189/F Adjustments to the curtilage of No. 21 Richmond Park and erection of 4 No. detached dwellings, garages and associated access road,... |
Fermanagh and Omagh |
Adjustments to the curtilage of No. 21 Richmond Park and erection of 4 No. detached dwellings, garages and associated access road, on development lands to the south east of 21 Richmond Park, Killyclogher, Omagh BT79 7SJ |
|
}
|
23/T0812/TCA Richmond Council Treeworks Planning Application |
Richmond |
Richmond Council Treeworks Planning Application |
|
}
|
23/02953/TCA Location: 189 Richmond Rd, Kingston upon Thames KT2 5DD1. Lime x 4 Reduce regrowth back to previous reduction points. (Approx... |
Kingston |
Location: 189 Richmond Rd, Kingston upon Thames KT2 5DD1. Lime x 4 Reduce regrowth back to previous reduction points. (Approx 2.5m)Reduce back branches growing over garden by 2.5m.Retain internal lateral spread for screening purpose. (Tree Heights 16m) |
|
7-2024-18099-M Erection of 86 non illuminated sponsorship signs on 33 roundabouts (Richmond Hill removed from list) (mixture of 1,2,3,4 & 5 per... |
Bournemouth |
Erection of 86 non illuminated sponsorship signs on 33 roundabouts (Richmond Hill removed from list) (mixture of 1,2,3,4 & 5 per roundabout) - Regulation 3 |